Former CDC Director Thomas Frieden was recently arrested on August 24, 2018 for forcible touching, sexual abuse, and harassment. Is that what this has come down to? Arresting a man responsible for preventing a 19-year CDC veteran whistleblower from speaking up against vaccines, to exaggerating the swine flu and pushing vaccines, making mandatory and involuntary tracking of pregnant women’s ongoing diabetes results law, and assisting former President Barack Obama with his healthcare scheme, and yet, they nail him on “groping a woman”. Not that sexual abuse should be taken lightly, but it wreaks of cover-up. Meanwhile, billions of taxpayer dollars have been injected into these potential scandals.
Sexual scandals seem to be a theme lately for those who are involved in much higher levels of corruption. Thomas Frieden is not “one of the nations most respected medical experts”, as the MSM would have you believe. In fact, Frieden’s history with a long chain of corrupt politicians and “philanthropists” is much bigger than most people realize. Thomas Frieden is a peg on the board, years in the making, being moved to where they need him, while always staying within the circle, and he’s still at it. Reviewing the nearly 30-year timeline, connections, and events below, one can draw their own conclusions as to what they believe the “bigger picture” is.
Thomas Frieden’s Career Timeline:
1990 – 1992: Frieden was an epidemic intelligence service officer for the Atlanta-based CDC, and was assigned to New York City.
1992 – 1996: Frieden was assistant commissioner of health and director of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and Bureau of Tuberculosis Control. While there, he secured city, state and federal funding for tuberculosis control. After controlling a tuberculosis epidemic and reducing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis by 80%, the city’s program became a “model” for tuberculosis control on a global scale.
1995 – 2001: Frieden worked as a technical advisor for the World Bank, health and population offices.
1996 – 2002: Frieden worked in India, as a medical officer for the World Health Organization on loan from the CDC. He helped the government of India implement the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program.
2002 – 2009: Frieden served as Commissioner of Health to the City of New York. He was also instrumental in the two-year test project of the electronic health record (EHR), a new system Obama was preparing to establish under the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act in 2009, just before appointing Frieden as CDC Director.
2004: As Commissioner, he proposed to eliminate separate written consent for HIV testing, which created controversy. Apparently he believed this would encourage physicians to offer HIV tests during routine medical care, which is what the CDC recommended. Advocates fought this legislation, believing it would undermine patients’ rights and become forced testing.
2009 – 2017: Former President Barack Obama appointed Thomas Frieden to CDC Director. He led the efforts on combatting the pandemic flu, Ebola, and Zika epidemics. In a statement, Obama called Frieden, “an expert in preparedness and response to health emergencies” who in seven years as the city health commissioner has “been at the forefront of the fight against heart disease, cancer and obesity, infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and AIDS, and in the establishment of electronic health records.” He promptly resigned on January 20, 2017 when the Trump administration stepped in.
2017 – present: Frieden began leading the $225 million initiative called “Resolve” to save 100 million lives over the next 30 years by preventing heart attacks and strokes. The effort is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and housed in New York City by a non-governmental organization, Vital Strategies.
Let’s cut to the chase and point to the facts of seven big red flags that Frieden was instrumental in. There are far more than seven, but these particular red flags will illustrate the patterns well.
7 BIG RED FLAGS:
RED FLAG #1: Involuntary Tracking of Pregnant Women’s Diabetes Data
A1C Mandatory Diabetes Registry
In 2005, when Frieden was the Health Commissioner of New York City, he worked to raise awareness about diabetes in pregnant women. He established an involuntary, non-disclosed hemoglobin A1C diabetes registry to track patients’ blood sugar control over several months. The information is reported to treating physicians. This decision, passed by the New York City Board of Health, that required laboratories to report A1C test results, created huge debates where many saw it as a violation of medical privacy.
As Chicago-Kent College of Law reported: “Whose Business is Your Pancreas? Potential Privacy Problems in New York City’s Mandatory Diabetes Registery”
This raises the question, what data was Frieden really after? It’s interesting this information gathering pertained to pregnant women, considering 10 years later they stated the Zika virus has the most impact on pregnant women’s babies, so much so, they created a “Zika pregnancy registry” as well, whereby they track the babies medical history until it’s second birthday. They actually have a short video of how this registry works on their site. Just what exactly are they tracking?
RED FLAG #2: More Data Scraping with Electronic Health Records (EHR)
This story is a tad bit longer, as it involves several players and shows the Obama/Frieden connection before Frieden became the CDC Director. What was Barack Obama’s “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009”, which established the Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program, all about? Obama created this stimulus package for physicians to buy this technology and make all health records electronic. But why? There was a big push for this. In fact, prominent venture capitalists jumped at this opportunity.
The Obama administration’s plan was to spend $19 billion to accelerate physicians using computerized medical records. Supposedly the physician incentive was for more than $40,000 spread over a few years for a physician who buys and uses the electronic health records. Physicians will only be paid for “meaningful use” of digital records. The Primary Care Information Project in NYC was the “model”, headed by Dr. Farzad Mostashari, an assistant commissioner in the city’s health department at the time. The NY project’s brief history began in 2007 with $27 million financing.
Interestingly, in this article by The New York Times, they don’t seem to mention the fact that Thomas R. Frieden was the NYC Health Commissioner at that time. That’s strange because Obama made it a point to praise him for his work “in the establishment of electronic health records” in a statement when he chose Frieden to be his CDC Director in 2009.
To be clear, NYC was working on this 2-yr “project”, Obama’s 2009 Act was put in place, then Frieden moves over to CDC Director. But this story doesn’t end here because this was a well thought-out project with several players involved. Who’s behind the technology?
They are “Well placed to benefit from President Obama’s stimulus package — which includes $19 billion for a national rollout of electronic medical record systems — the software company is preparing for breakneck growth.”
Meet eClinicalWorks 3 founders. India natives and American entrepreneurs Girish Navani, brother Mahesh Navani, and cousin Rajesh Dharmapuriya. They were so psyched, just one month after the new Act passed, they were taking on Walmart. Yes, the one Hillary Clinton used to serve on the board and work for.
By 2013, supposedly over half of the doctors in the U.S. have ditched their paper-based systems for the electronic health records (EHRs), according to U.S. Dept of Health & Human Services. The market was estimated at $6-$10 billion!
The Washington Post and The New York Times couldn’t say enough good stuff about it, and by September, 2015 eClinicalWorks was kicking butt, and decided to buy this property for a cool $21.5 million to house their incoming staff.
Just one month later, the New York Post painted a very different picture for how well this new system was working in the industry: “Team Obama’s electronic medical records mandate is a disaster.”
Then it happened – on May 31, 2017, eClinicalWorks hit a stumbling block, when the U.S. Department of Justice fined them $155 million for misrepresenting capabilities of its software.
Under the program, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) offers incentive payments to healthcare providers that adopt certified EHR technology and meet certain requirements relating to their use of the technology.
To obtain certification for their product, companies that develop and market EHR software must attest that their product satisfies applicable HHS-adopted criteria and pass testing by an accredited independent certifying entity approved by HHS.
In its complaint-in-intervention, the government contends that ECW falsely obtained that certification for its EHR software when it concealed from its certifying entity that its software did not comply with the requirements for certification.
“This settlement is the largest False Claims Act recovery in the District of Vermont and we believe the largest financial recovery in the history of the State of Vermont,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Eugenia A.P. Cowles for the District of Vermont.
Under the terms of the settlement agreements, ECW & 3 of its founders, are jointly & severally liable for the payment of $154.92 mil to the U.S. Separately, Developer Jagan Vaithilingam will pay $50,000, & Project Managers Bryan Sequeira, & Robert Lynes will each pay $15,000.
As part of the settlement, ECW entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the HHS Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) covering the company’s EHR software. This innovative five-year CIA requires, among other things, that ECW retain an Independent Software Quality Oversight Organization to assess ECW’s software quality control systems and provide written semi-annual reports to OIG and ECW documenting its reviews and recommendations.
ECW must also retain an Independent Review Organization to review ECW’s arrangements with health care providers to ensure compliance with the Anti-Kickback Statute.
What is an anti-kickback statute? The federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“Anti-Kickback Statute”) is a criminal statute that prohibits the exchange (or offer to exchange), of anything of value, in an effort to induce (or reward) the referral of federal health care program business. See 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b.
Here is the icing on the cake… in 2014 (when they still thought she wouldn’t lose), eClinicalWorks won a government contract to provide electronic health record services to the medical professionals who manage care at ALL 23 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities. That following year is when they bought their new $21.5 million property. Funny how that works.
So to recap, Thomas Frieden, NYC Health Commissioner was working on the electronic health records project for two years before Obama created the “Act”. In 2009, he brought Frieden on as the CDC Director. Obama laid out billions on this, and big investors jumped on board. eClinicalWorks was building a name for itself and one month after the Act passed, they landed Walmart. In 2014 they land a government contract providing the EHR software to ALL immigration and customs enforcement detention facilities. These records therefore manage the data of all adults and children seeing the medical professionals that come into those facilities. Why is it important to gather this data, especially coming through immigration? Is child trafficking at play here? Is organ trafficking at play here? Neither is a leap, once you have reviewed all of the statistical data on both.
Clearly the Justice Department was onto them, and it’s also clear that Obama orchestrated his healthcare scheme quite well with the help of Thomas Frieden.
RED FLAG #3: Swine Flu Data Cover-up & Vaccine Push Scandal
In 2009, CBS reported “Swine Flu Cases Overestimated”? Kudos to Sharyl Attkisson for doing a 3-month investigation into this, and reporting her findings. According to their investigation, they stated that it was unlikely that people have the H1N1, and in fact, probably didn’t have the flu at all. This was based on their state-by-state test results they had obtained over a 3-month period. Below is a portion of Sharyl’s report:
In late July, the CDC abruptly advised states to stop testing for H1N1 flu, and stopped counting individual cases. The rationale given for the CDC guidance to forego testing and tracking individual cases was: why waste resources testing for H1N1 flu when the government has already confirmed there’s an epidemic?
CBS News learned that the decision to stop counting H1N1 flu cases was made so hastily that states weren’t given the opportunity to provide input. Instead, on July 24, the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists, CSTE, issued the following notice to state public health officials on behalf of the CDC:
“Attached are the Q&As that will be posted on the CDC website tomorrow explaining why CDC is no longer reporting case counts for novel H1N1. CDC would have liked to have run these by you for input but unfortunately there was not enough time before these needed to be posted (emphasis added).”
When CDC did not provide us with the material, we filed a Freedom of Information request with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). More than two months later, the request has not been fulfilled. We also asked CDC for state-by-state test results prior to halting of testing and tracking, but CDC was again, initially, unresponsive.
While we waited for CDC to provide the data, which it eventually did, we asked all 50 states for their statistics on state lab-confirmed H1N1 prior to the halt of individual testing and counting in July. The results reveal a pattern that surprised a number of health care professionals we consulted. The vast majority of cases were negative for H1N1 as well as seasonal flu, despite the fact that many states were specifically testing patients deemed to be most likely to have H1N1 flu, based on symptoms and risk factors, such as travel to Mexico.
Because of the uncertainties, the CDC advises even those who were told they had H1N1 to get vaccinated unless they had lab confirmation. “Persons who are uncertain about how they were diagnosed should get the 2009 H1N1 vaccine.”
Speaking to CBS’ “60 Minutes,” CDC Director Dr. Frieden said he has confidence that the vaccine will be safe and effective: “We’re confident it will be effective we have every reason to believe that it will be safe.”
However, the CDC recommendation for those who had “probable” or “presumed” H1N1 flu to go ahead and get vaccinated anyway means the relatively small proportion of those who actually did have H1N1 flu will be getting the vaccine unnecessarily. This exposes them to rare but significant side effects, such as paralysis from Guillain-Barre syndrome.
It also uses up vaccine, which is said to be in short supply. The CDC was hoping to have shipped 40 million doses by the end of October, but only about 30 million doses will be available this month.
Sharyl eventually received a letter from the CDC in regards to her FOIA request, stating that her request was denied because it is “not a matter of widespread and exceptional media and public interest.”
Bottom line, this was Frieden’s show. He instructed all states to stop running tests, and instead encouraged everyone to go get this vaccine (30 million doses worth), just to “be safe”, while putting people at risk of the side effects, including paralysis! Does this sound like a responsible decision by someone who is supposed to be looking out for everyone’s well-being? What was in that vaccine, and why did he deny the FOIA request?
RED FLAG #4: CDC Funding Under Frieden’s Directorship
Something you may not know about the CDC: Once the State Dept, Dept of Defense, and USAID are approved for funding, those funds get transferred to the CDC. They are responsible for disbursing billions of taxpayer dollars to “partners” such as foreign governments, U.S. government agencies, ministries of health, WHO, foundations, academic institutions, NGOs, faith-based organizations, businesses and other private organizations. Between 2010-2017 they disbursed between $5-10 million to Clinton Health Access Initiative. This is very interesting to note, being as Frieden was the Director of the CDC from 2009-2017. Coincidence?
There is also a separate CDC Foundation, who also felt encouraged to give between $100,000 – $1 million to CHAI during that same time frame. Don’t be confused by the CDC Group Pl listed, as that is owned by the UK government. Though no surprise there, as they also contributed to CHAI, most of whom couldn’t possibly make the claim they believed CHAI is legit. Anyone who looks at the Clintons tax records and registration history can see the corruption. Anyone willing to give millions to an organization ought to do a thorough financial background to see where their money flows. No excuse.
Take a look at this astounding breakdown of funds transferred to the CDC in 2016 for disbursement. It’s especially intriguing as to how much (nearly $11m) was supposedly transferred for Haiti response. One wonders how that may have been spent? Don’t be confused by the Zika funding amount listed under “reimbursable”. A Zika Response and Preparedness Appropriations Act of 2016 was passed on September 29, 2016 in the amount of $1.1 billion dollars. This congressional report on funding for the Zika Virus in one heck of a read.
This report states: “On February 22, 2016, the Obama Administration requested more than $1.89 billion in supplemental funding for the Zika response, all of which it asked to be designated as an emergency requirement, which would effectively exempt the funds from discretionary spending limits.” This came just a few weeks after the WHO declared the Zika virus outbreak to be a public health emergency of international concern. Patterns and timelines are important to pay attention to.
Considering the CDC’s 2015 report claimed 62 “symptomatic cases” across the United States and 10 “symptomatic cases” across the United States Territories, that seems like an awful lot of money to combat the virus? Suddenly, in 2016 the virus was spreading rapidly, and in April, 2016, Thomas Frieden made an urgent statement, while gathering more than 300 local, state, and federal authorities and experts to the Atlanta based CDC: “The mosquitoes that carry Zika virus are already active in US territories, hundreds of travelers with Zika have already returned to the continental US, and we could well see clusters of Zika virus in the continental US in the coming months. Urgent action is needed, especially to minimize the risk of exposure during pregnancy.” And just like that, a new pregnancy registry was created, and physicians all across the country were encouraging women to get tested and monitored.
On July 29, 2016, the Washington Post backed this up: “Zika is spreading explosively in Puerto Rico, reports say.” Apparently there was a huge jump in the United States as well because the CDC reported 5168 “symptomatic cases” in the United States and 36,512 “symptomatic cases” in the United States Territories. Those numbers would most certainly bolster a vote to pass the funding.
Just two months later the funding was passed. Then, on November 18, 2016, the Washington Post reported: “The WHO no longer considers Zika a global health risk.” Gosh, considering they were working on developing vaccines in August, they sure nipped that in the bud fast! By June, 2017, the Washington Post reported “Puerto Rico declares the Zika epidemic to be over”, inclusive of a daunting photo of a graveyard and a man sweeping dirt off the top of a cross.
The epidemic “came and went”, with the WHO setting the stage, Obama and friends receiving $1.1 billion in funds, Frieden running the show, and even Bill Gates coming to the rescue with his mosquito born cures in some areas. It was a full-year whirlwind, and by 2017, with a whole new administration in place, the CDC reported the Zika virus cases dropped to 452 in the US and 666 in US Territories. Yes, a peculiar number indeed. As of 2018 there have been 41 cases in the US and 82 in US Territories, all being “symptomatic cases”.
Being as the majority of the cases are “symptomatic”, is it possible that the numbers indicated were inflated, much like what happened with the Swine Flu? What were in the Zika virus vaccines? This 2-year monitoring “registry” of pregnant women who show “symptoms” of Zika virus is still rolling today.
RED FLAG #5: CDC Blocks Whistleblower Testimony on Vaccines
As reported by PR Newswire, EcoWatch and in the movie Vaxxed, whistleblower Dr. William Thompson was planning to testify in a Tennessee court case involving a 16 year old boy claiming his autism was caused by vaccine injuries. Unfortunately, Thomas Frieden sent a letter blocking him from doing so. PR Newswire reports: “Dr. Thompson has publicly stated to Congressman William Posey and others that he and his colleagues in the CDC Vaccine Safety Branch were ordered to commit scientific fraud, destroy evidence and manipulate data to conceal the link between autism and vaccines.”
Dr. Thompson is a 19 year veteran at the CDC and formerly a senior vaccine safety scientist at their Immunology Safety Office, yet Frieden sent a letter to the court denying the request to allow Dr. Thompson to testify stating that “Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS.” My gosh, he couldn’t have said that better.
Dr. Thompson’s attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. feels that Thompson’s testimony is critical and intends to appeal the CDC’s denial to Federal court. Dr. Thompson’s allegation is that the “agency altered science to undermine autism cases worth potentially $1 trillion in compensation ordered by Congress.” This is no surprise, as there have been FOIA requests on vaccines that come back nearly fully redacted. How is it that they feel they can demand and inject human beings with cocktails and not tell them what’s in the cocktail? Still don’t think they’re hiding something? Why the constant cover-ups?
RED FLAG #6: Resolve to Save 100 Million Lives and Prevent Epidemics
In September, 2017, it was announced that Thomas Frieden was to lead a 5-year initiative called ‘Resolve to Save 100 Million Lives and Prevent Epidemics.’ Backed by $225 million in funding from none other than the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, and Bloomberg Philanthropies, with the goal of accelerating progress in reducing deaths from heart attack and stroke, and to prevent deadly epidemics in low and middle-income countries. It operates from a New York based non-government organization called ‘Vital Strategies’ which works in more than 60 countries.
Vital Strategies will provide support and technical assistance to the ‘Resolve’ initiative, and ‘Resolve’ will work closely with the World Health Organization (WHO), Bloomberg School of Public Health at The Johns Hopkins University, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The World Bank and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. That is a doozy of a list.
As indicated on a Vital Strategies press release from 2008 – they added a section at the top pertaining to their merge that took place in Jan 2016 between the World Lung Foundation and The Union North America (U.S. & Canada), which has formed as ‘Vital Strategies’. It also reflects a $500 million commitment by Michael Bloomberg and Bill Gates to prevent tobacco related deaths.
In addition to lung health areas, they also focus on maternal health and have implemented an obstetrics program in Kigoma, Morogoro, and Pwani provinces of Tanzania. Yet another area where they are focusing on pregnant women.
What exactly are these “usual suspects” up to now?
RED FLAG #7: Frieden Arrested for Sexual Abuse
Last, but certainly not least, Thomas Frieden was arrested on August 24, 2018 for forcible touching, sexual abuse, and harassment. The allegations are made by a woman who was a friend of Frieden and his family for more than 30 years.
Frieden’s court date is set for October 11, 2018 as indicated below in the public court records.
CDC Funding is Now Being Cut Substantially
In February 2018, the Washington Post reported that the CDC intends to cut funding that is going toward fighting epidemic diseases in other countries by 80%. It’s plan is to reduce its prevention activities in 39 out of 49 countries. According to WaPo, they claim U.S. government officials stated “money is running out.” Could it be from the billions that have flowed from taxpayer dollars, through the government, into the pockets of the corrupt, or is this just a cover story for reducing funds to areas that didn’t require this level of “preparatory” assistance to begin with?
In 2014, $600 million was awarded to the CDC to help other countries prevent infectious diseases, and that money is going to run out by September 2019. The CDC plans to focus on 10 priority countries beginning in October 2019, consisting of India, Thailand and Vietnam in Asia, Jordan in the Middle East, Kenya, Uganda, Liberia, Nigeria and Senegal in Africa, and Guatemala in Central America.
Apparently this created quite a stir and a coalition of global health organizations that represent more than 200 groups sent a letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar requesting the administration reconsider these reductions. They believe it is critical for health and national security.
U.S. taxpayers shelled out $5.4 billion in emergency funding during the Ebola outbreak, when Thomas Frieden led the agency through BOTH the Ebola and Zika outbreaks. Frieden had this to say about the funding reductions, “This is the front line against terrible organisms. Like terrorism, you can’t fight it just within our borders. You’ve got to fight epidemic diseases where they emerge. Either we help or hope we get lucky it isn’t an epidemic that travelers will catch or spread to our country.” Is this why this “circle” of clowns continue to dump billions of taxpayer dollars, plus fundraiser dollars, into other countries rather than focusing on the one they reside in? Or, is there something else going on entirely?
Just four months later, in June 2018, Frieden did an OpEd in Science Magazine titled ‘Still not ready for Ebola’ followed by “Ebola is back. The disease that killed more than 11,000 people in West Africa just a few years ago has returned, striking the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).” He went on to talk about the new vaccine that helped contain the outbreak, how important these “tools” are, and how quick response time is necessary.
After reiterating the seriousness of Ebola and other epidemics and the need for additional work to be done in multiple countries so they are well prepared, he went in for the kill targeting the U.S. for money:
“Most important, the entire world needs to support countries, including DRC, that have undergone voluntary external assessments of preparedness, known as Joint External Evaluations (JEEs).
Thousands of technical experts—the vast majority coming from within these countries themselves—and billions of dollars are urgently needed to close the thousands of life-threatening gaps identified, and resources that have been committed need to be rapidly and effectively deployed.
The United States, historically a leader on global health security, now risks falling behind in pandemic preparedness. The proposed federal budget would slash U.S. global health security funding by two-thirds and require the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to leave the field open to microbes in dozens of countries. As the latest Ebola outbreak reminds us, if the CDC’s funding is not protected, the agency will not be able to help protect us. Because an outbreak can spread from a remote area to any major city in the world in 36 hours or less, we are all at risk. And as long as some countries remain at risk, none of us is safe.”
The Bigger Picture
Patterns are important, and timelines are even more significant. How is it that funding is often requested in advance of an outbreak? Or, at specific opportune times an outbreak happens and emergency funding is quickly disbursed? Why all the secrecy, refusing FOIA requests, putting a stop to a CDC veteran from testifying, creating a mandatory registry and breaking privacy rights, demanding states not test and simply inject vaccines into human beings that could potentially cause paralysis? Where did that $1.1 billion go that was approved just a few months before Obama exited the White House? And why is it that we are suddenly witnessing an 80% decrease in funding with this new administration? The writing is on the wall.
There is a much bigger picture at play here. These are not the only scandals in connection with Thomas Frieden, which will be discussed more in the future. The real question is, what are they really doing with billions of taxpayer dollars? Why the need to create electronic healthcare systems to track everyone’s personal data, while creating mandatory registries? The people didn’t ask for this, and most would likely vote this down. What data are they really after? Many would suggest “depopulation”, but the evidence and patterns are more indicative of “DNA manipulation”, while those that fall sick or die from vaccines are collateral damage, sadly. Why won’t the CDC share what is in the vaccines they demand all children receive, while pushing numerous other vaccines under the guise of “it will save you”? If these “tools” are so profound, why all the secrecy, and why is a vast amount of the population sicker than they’ve ever been before? The CDC is supposed to protect people, and Frieden’s track record clearly contradicts that.
People can only cry conspiracy theory for so long before the facts smack them in the face. Everything reported above are actual events, funding, and even an arrest that took place. When will the world wake up and see that our land, our finances, our health, and our privacy have been at risk for decades by these vultures? Conspiracy theory no more. The people deserve answers, full transparency with documentation, and above all – JUSTICE.